"If we remain silent, then whatever he says,
that means we are accepting."
Bhavananda: Prabhupada was complaining of mental distress this morning also.
Bhakti-caru: Srila Prabhupada?
Bhakti-caru: Srila Prabhupada?
Bhakti-caru: (Bengali) ...mental distress?
Translation: What was that all about mental distress?
Prabhupada: Hm, hm.
Kaviraja [Doctor]: (Hindi)
Translation: Say it. Say it.
Prabhupada: Vahi bat ... jekoi hamko poison kiya
Translation: That same thing … that someone has poisoned me.
Devotee: Someone gave him poison here.
Kaviraja: (Hindi long explanation)
Tamala Krsna: Prabhupada was thinking that someone had poisoned him.
Tamala Krsna: That was the mental distress.
Tamala Krsna: What did Kaviraja just say?
Bhakti-caru: He said that when Srila Prabhupada was saying that, there must be some truth behind it. (People all speaking at once)
Tamala Krsna: Srila Prabhupada, Sastriji says that there must be some truth to it if you say that.
So who is it that has poisoned?
[13 second pause, Srila Prabhupada remains silent and does not answer]
[ S.P.Room Conversation November 10, 1977, Vrndavana
Note: So here again is another proof that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned. Tamal Krsna asks Srila Prabhupada a very clear question "So who is it that has poisoned?" He doesn't ask "Have you being poisoned ?" because that is already cleared by Srila Prabhupada's statement "That same thing … that someone has poisoned me" The question now is who has poisoned.
Therefore Srila Prabhupada's silence means he's accepting what Tamal says.
If we remain silent, then whatever he says, that means we are accepting.
[S.P. Discussion about Guru Maharaji August 13, 1973, Paris]
If Srila Prabhupada's statement "That same thing … that someone has poisoned me" was misunderstood by the devotees at that time and Srila Prabhupada was only referring to a previous discussion as the bogus IRM group say, then when Srila Prabhupada was asked a very pointed question by Tamal namely "So who is it that has poisoned?" why did he not say "No not that i am poisoned, i was only referring to the previous discussion in which i said it was possible" ???
Srila Prabhupada was silent because he agreed with what they had understood, as one devotee immediately stated "Someone gave him poison here."
Therefore, SRILA PRABHUPADA CONFIRMS AGAIN "SOMEONE HAS POISONED ME" BY REMAINING SILENT AND NOT ANSWERING TAMAL.
Another point in regards to Tamals question about who has poisoned, can be understood by looking at the following:
Guest (6): Swamiji, you have seen Krsna?
Prabhupada: What do you think? We are all rascals, blindly following? Do you think like that? Then why I have not seen? Why do you ask this? If we are acting for Krsna, do you mean to say that we are following blindly? Do you think like that? What is your opinion? If we have not seen Krsna, then how we are acting for Krsna? Hm? What is your idea? We are all fools, that without seeing the master we are acting? Do you think like that? Why don't you answer? This is foolish question. How one can serve a master without seeing the master? Is it a fact that without seeing the master one is serving?
[S.P. Morning Walk December 5, 1976, Hyderabad]
So we can answer poison giver Tamal by using the above:
"What do you think Tamal ?..... Why do you ask this? .....What is your opinion?..... What is your idea? .......Why don't you answer? This is foolish question because the answer is OBVIOUS !!!