April 19, 1973, in Cheviot Hills Park, Los Angeles
Srila Prabhupada is accompanied by Dr. Singh, Karandhara dasa adhikari,
Brahmananda Svami and other students.
Srila Prabhupada. This material world is a composition of three
qualities--sattva, rajas and tamas (goodness, passion and
ignorance)--which are working everywhere. These three qualities are
present in various proportions in all species of life. For example, some
trees produce nice fruit, while others are simply meant for fuel. This
is due to the association of particular qualities of nature. Among
animals also, these three qualities are present. The cow is in the
quality of goodness, the lion in passion, and the monkey in ignorance.
According to Darwin, Darwin's father is a monkey. [Laughter.] He has
Dr. Singh. Darwin has said that some species become extinct in the
struggle for survival. Those which are capable of surviving will
survive, but those which are not will become extinct. So he says
survival and extinction go side by side.
Srila Prabhupada. Nothing is extinct. The monkey is not extinct.
Darwin's immediate forefather, the monkey, is still existing.
Karandhara. Darwin said there must be a natural selection. But selection
means choice. So who is choosing?
Srila Prabhupada. That must be a person. Who is allowing someone to
survive and someone to be killed? There must be some authority with
discretion to give such an order. That is our first proposition. Who
that authority is, is explained in Bhagavad-gita. Krsna says,
mayadhyaksena prakrtih: "Nature is working under My supervision." (Bg.
Dr. Singh. Darwin also says that the different species were not created
simultaneously, but evolved gradually.
Srila Prabhupada. Then what is his explanation for how the process of
Karandhara. Modern proponents of Darwinism say that the first living
organism was created chemically.
Srila Prabhupada. And I say to them, "If life originated from chemicals,
and if your science is so advanced, then why can't you create life
biochemically in your laboratories?"
In the Future
Karandhara. They say they will create life in the future.
Srila Prabhupada. What future? When this crucial point is raised, they
reply, "We shall do it in the future." Why in the future? That is
nonsense. "Trust no future, however pleasant." If they are so advanced,
they must demonstrate now how life can be created from chemicals.
Otherwise what is the meaning of their advancement? They are talking
Karandhara. They say that they are right on the verge of creating life.
Srila Prabhupada. That's only a different way of saying the same thing:
"In the future." The scientists must admit that they still do not know
the origin of life. Their claim that they will soon prove a chemical
origin of life is something like paying someone with a postdated check.
Suppose I give you a postdated check for ten thousand dollars but I
actually have no money. What is the value of that check? Scientists are
claiming that their science is wonderful, but when a practical example
is wanted, they say they will provide it in the future. Suppose I say
that I possess millions of dollars, and when you ask me for some money I
say, "Yes, I will now give you a big postdated check. Is that all
right?" If you are intelligent, you will reply, "At present give me at
least five dollars in cash so I can see something tangible." Similarly,
the scientists cannot produce even a single blade of grass in their
laboratories, yet they are claiming that life is produced from
chemicals. What is this nonsense? Is no one questioning this?
Karandhara. They say that life is produced by chemical laws.
Srila Prabhupada. As soon as there is a law, we must take into
consideration that someone made the law. Despite all their so-called
advancement, the scientists in their laboratories cannot produce even a
blade of grass. What kind of scientists are they?
Dr. Singh. They say that in the ultimate analysis, everything came from
matter. Living matter came from nonliving matter.
Srila Prabhupada. Then where is this living matter coming from now? Do
the scientists say that life came from matter in the past but does not
at the present? Where is the ant coming from now--from the dirt?
The Missing Link
Dr. Singh. in fact, there are several theories explaining how life
originated from matter, how living matter came from the nonliving.
Srila Prabhupada. [casting Dr. Singh in the role of a materialistic
scientist]. All right, scientist, why is life not coming from matter
now? You rascal. Why isn't life coming from matter now? Actually such
scientists are rascals. They childishly say that life came from matter,
although they are not at all able to prove it. Our Krsna consciousness
movement should expose all these rascals. They are only bluffing. Why
don't they create life immediately? In the past, they say, life arose
from matter; and they say that this will happen again in the future.
They even say that they will create life from matter. What kind of
theory is this? They have already commented that life began from matter.
This refers to the past--"began." Then why do they now speak of the
future? Is it not contradictory? They are expecting the past to occur in
the future. This is childish nonsense.
Karandhara. They say that life arose from matter in the past and that
they will create life this way in the future.
Srila Prabhupada. What is this nonsense? If they cannot prove that life
arises from matter in the present, how do they know life arose this way
in the past?
Dr. Singh. They are assuming...
Srila Prabhupada. Everyone can assume, but this is not science. Everyone
can assume something. You can assume something, I can assume something.
But there must be proof. We can prove that life arises from life. For
example, a father begets a child. The father is living, and the child is
living. But where is their proof that a father can be a dead stone?
Where is their proof? We can easily prove that life begins from life.
And the original life is Krsna. That also can be proven. But what
evidence exists that a child is born of stone? They cannot actually
prove that life comes from matter. They are leaving that aside for the
Karandhara. The scientists say that they can now formulate acids, amino
acids, that are almost like one-celled living organisms. They say that
because these acids so closely resemble living beings, there must be
just one missing link needed before they can create life.
Srila Prabhupada. Nonsense! Missing link. I'll challenge them to their
face! [Laughter.] They are missing this challenge. The missing link is
this challenge to their face.
Nobel Prize for an Ass
Dr. Singh. Some scientists hope that in the future they will be able to
make babies in test tubes.
Srila Prabhupada. Test tubes?
Dr. Singh. Yes, they intend to combine male and female elements in
Srila Prabhupada. If they begin with living entities, what is the
purpose of the test tube? It is only a place for combination, but so is
the womb. Where is the credit for the scientists if this is already
being done in nature's test tube?
Karandhara. It is already being done by nature, but when some scientist
does it, people will give him the Nobel Prize.
Srila Prabhupada. Yes, that is stated in Srimad-Bhagavatam:
sva-vid-varahostra-kharaih samstutah purusah pasuh. This verse
indicates that those who praise men who are like animals are no better
than dogs, hogs, camels and asses. Sva means "dog," vid-varaha means
"stool-eating hog," ustra means "camel," and khara means "ass." If the
Nobel Prize is given to a scientist who is a rascal, the men on the
committee who give him that prize are no better than dogs, hogs, camels
and asses. We don't accept them as human beings. One animal is praised
by another animal. Where is the credit in that? If the men on the
committee are no better than animals, anyone who receives the Nobel
Prize in science is fool number one, because animals are praising him,
not human beings.
Dr. Singh. For some scientists, the Nobel Prize is the ultimate.
Srila Prabhupada. They are rascals. They are speaking nonsense, and
because they are juggling words, others are being misled.
Brahmananda Swami. Nobel is the person who invented dynamite.
Srila Prabhupada. He has created great misfortune, and he has left his
money for creating further misfortune. [Laughter.]
Brahmananda Swami. The Gita says that demoniac people perform acts meant
to destroy the world.
Srila Prabhupada. Yes. Ugra-karmanah ksayaya jagato 'hitah (Bg. 16.9).
They perform acts meant for inauspiciousness and the destruction of the
The Difference Between
the Living and the Nonliving
[Srila Prabhupada points at a dead tree with his cane.]
Srila Prabhupada. Formerly leaves and twigs were growing from this tree.
Now they are not. How would the scientists explain this?
Karandhara. They would say the tree's chemical composition has changed.
Srila Prabhupada. To prove that theory, they must be able to inject the
proper chemicals to make branches and leaves grow again. The scientific
method includes observation, hypothesis and then demonstration. Then it
is perfect. But the scientists cannot actually demonstrate in their
laboratories that life comes from matter. They simply observe and then
speak nonsense. They are like children. In our childhood, we observed a
gramophone box and thought that within the box was a man singing, an
electric man. We thought there must have been an electric man or some
kind of ghost in it. [Laughter.]
Dr. Singh. One of the popular questions that arises when we start
studying biology is "What is the difference between a living organism
and that which is not living?" The textbooks say that the chief
characteristics that distinguish the two are that a living being can
move and reproduce, whereas dead matter can do neither. But the books
never talk about the nature of the soul or about the consciousness of
the living entity.
Srila Prabhupada. But consciousness is the primary indication that life
is present. Only because of consciousness can a living being move and
reproduce. Because a person is conscious, he thinks of marrying, and
begetting children. And the original consciousness is described in the
Vedas: tad aiksata bahu syam (Chandogya Upanisad 6.2.3). This means that
God, the original conscious being, said, "I shall become many." Without
consciousness, there is no possibility of by-products.
The Individual Living
Srila Prabhupada. The gardeners supply water to the green trees, so why
don't they supply water to this dead tree and make it green?
Dr. Singh. From experience they know that it will not grow.
Srila Prabhupada. Then what is the element that is lacking? Scientists
say that chemicals are the cause of life, but all the chemicals that
were present when the tree was alive are still there. And these
chemicals are still supporting the lives of many living entities such as
microbes and insects. So they cannot say that life energy is lacking in
the body of the tree. The life energy is there.
Dr. Singh. But what about the life energy of the tree itself?
Srila Prabhupada. Yes, that is the difference. The living force is
individual, and the particular individual living entity that was the
tree has left. This must be the case, since all the chemicals necessary
to support life are still there, yet the tree is dead. Here is another
example. Suppose I am living in an apartment, and then I leave it. I am
gone, but many other living entities remain there--ants, spiders and so
forth. So it is not true that simply because I have left the apartment,
it can no longer accommodate life. Other living entities are still
living there. It is simply that I--an individual living being--have
left. The chemicals in the tree are like the apartment: they are simply
the environment for the individual force--the soul--to act through. And
the soul is an individual. I am an individual, and therefore I may leave
the apartment. Similarly, the microbes are also individuals; they have
individual consciousness. If they are moving in one direction but are
somehow blocked, they think, "Let me go the other way." They have
Karandhara. But in a dead body there is no personality.
Srila Prabhupada. This indicates that the individual soul has left that
body. The soul has left, and therefore the tree does not grow.
Dr. Singh. Within the living body, Srila Prabhupada, there are
innumerable small living entities, but the individual self who owns the
body is also living there. Is that correct?
Srila Prabhupada. Yes. In my body there are millions of living entities.
In my intestines there are many worms. If they become strong, then
whatever I eat, they eat, and I derive no benefit from the food.
Therefore those who are full of hookworms eat very much but do not grow.
They become lean and thin, and they are very hungry, because these small
living entities are eating their food. So there are thousands and
millions of living entities in my body--they are individuals, and I am
an individual--but I am the proprietor of the body, just as I may be the
proprietor of a garden in which many millions of living entities reside.
Student. So if I eat krsna-prasada [food offered to Lord Krsna], are the
living entities in my body also eating prasada?
Srila Prabhupada. Yes. You are very benevolent. [Laughs.] You take
krsna-prasada for others.
Karandhara. Welfare work.
Srila Prabhupada. Yes, but there are so many things within you for them
to eat that you do not need to make a separate endeavor to feed them.
Minimum Words, Maximum
Srila Prabhupada. The individual soul is never lost. He does not die,
nor is he born. He simply changes from one body to another, just as one
changes garments. This is perfect science.
Dr. Singh. But why don't scientists accept this?
Srila Prabhupada. They are not nice men. They are rascals. They are not
even gentlemen. Under appropriate circumstances, gentlemen will have
some shyness or some shame. But these men are shameless. They cannot
properly answer our challenges, yet they shamelessly claim that they are
scientists and that they will create life. They are not even gentlemen.
At least I regard them like that. A gentleman will be ashamed to speak
Dr. Singh. They do not think before they speak.
Srila Prabhupada. That means that they are not human beings. A human
being thinks twice before saying anything. Krsna makes the presence of
life within the body so easy to understand. He says:
dehino 'smin yatha dehe
kaumaram yauvanam jara
dhiras tatra na muhyati
["As the embodied soul continually passes, in this body, from boyhood to
youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death.
The self-realized soul is not bewildered by such a change." (Bg. 2.13)]
In these two lines, Krsna solves the whole biological problem. That is
knowledge. Minimum words, maximum solution. Volumes of books expounding
nonsense have no meaning. Materialistic scientists are like croaking
frogs: ka-ka-ka, ka-ka-ka. [Srila Prabhupada imitates the sound of a
croaking frog, and the others laugh.] The frogs are thinking, "Oh, we
are talking very nicely," but the result is that the snake finds them
and says, "Oh, here is a nice frog!" [Srila Prabhupada imitates the
sound of a snake eating a frog.] Bup! Finished. When death comes,
everything is finished. The materialistic scientists are
croaking--ka-ka-ka--but when death comes, their scientific industry is
finished, and they become dogs, cats or something like that.